Bridging the Psychedelic Divide

From the Underground to a Regulated Economy

This article first appeared in the Psychedelics edition of Fat Nugs Magazine, published in the summer of 2025

The psychedelic ecosystem is undergoing a transformative shift, much like the early days of the regulated cannabis industry, moving from an illicit underground world toward a regulated economy.

Legislative frameworks in Oregon and Colorado provide a structured pathway for underground operators to gain legitimacy and stability. Yet, obstacles persist, including deep mistrust between the underground and regulators, concerns about indigenous reciprocity, prohibitive costs, and limitations in current frameworks that fail to address the full range of psychedelic practices.

Proponents of regulation believe it cultivates a safe and sustainable industry by ensuring transparency, proper labeling, accurate dosing, and adherence to safety protocols, while critics argue that if psychedelics truly posed significant risks warranting intense regulatory scrutiny and top-down consumer protection, their enduring popularity and widespread demand would defy explanation. Yet while underground self-regulation may have worked well in the past, illegal commercialization and e-commerce have changed the rules, allowing operators to profit from misrepresentations without checks on quality controls.

Through collaboration, regulators and the psychedelic community can strive to build a unified, sustainable, and regulated ecosystem that ensures safety, equitable access, and a foundation for nationwide acceptance.

Underground Contributions and Challenges in the Psychedelic Resurgence

For decades, brave underground pioneers such as Sasha Shulgin, the Godfather of Ecstasy, risked legal and social repercussions to keep the flame of psychedelic medicine alive. These visionaries operated in a time when these compounds were heavily stigmatized, and their courageous contributions paved the way to the current state of psychedelic momentum, budding clinical research, and resurgence of public interest.
The underground ushered in a community dedicated to education, harm reduction, and expanding awareness of the use of psychedelics for therapeutic, spiritual, and recreational purposes, often operating with strong ethical principles despite legal risks. As psychedelics gain popularity and accessibility, however, risks associated with the underground are surfacing.

Some commentators believe that unregulated psychedelic products pose a significant risk to public health. A stark example is the recent outbreak of illnesses tied to Diamond Shruumz-brand so-called “mushroom” edibles, which resulted in over 180 reported cases of severe illness across 34 states, including 73 hospitalizations and three deaths. Although the investigation did not reveal a clear answer to what caused the illnesses, the FDA discovered synthetic and pharmaceutical substances in these products – not mushrooms at all.

Similarly, in November 2024, California authorities confiscated and destroyed over $3,000,000 worth of PolkaDot Mushroom Magic bars that were suspected to contain 4-Acetoxy-DET and 4-Hydroxy DET, citing consumer health risks as the basis for their actions.

Bad actors attempting to take advantage of renewed interest in psychedelics are causing intensified scrutiny, posing increasing risks for underground operators, including raids, product recalls, and reputational damage.

Bridging the Psychedelic Divide Between the Underground and Regulators

Much like cannabis, the improvident War on Drugs has left deep scars on the relationship between regulators and the psychedelic underground. This history has fostered skepticism toward regulatory bodies perceived as complicit in decades of prohibitionist policies.

While most psychedelics remain federally illegal, regulatory structures in emerging legal markets, such as those in Oregon and Colorado, prioritize clinic-based supervised use models. While these approaches aim to legitimize psychedelics, they risk sidelining core underground practices, such as spiritual use. The financial barriers to entering the above-ground market are also steep.

The underground has long demonstrated the potential for self-regulation through community-driven initiatives, exemplified by organizations like DanceSafe and Hyphae Labs, which thrive and innovate outside traditional regulatory frameworks. But relying solely on self-regulation overlooks the opportunity for broader public trust, safety assurances, and equitable access that a well-designed legal framework can provide.

To bridge the divide, regulators must formally recognize the contributions of the underground community, integrating its models of harm reduction and education into legislation. Democratizing access to funding and reducing barriers to entry for small operators can also foster a more inclusive legal market. For instance, providing grants for licensing fees and operational costs could alleviate financial burdens and incentivize participation from a diverse range of actors.

Of the current regulated models, Colorado may be the best fit for this transition.

Business Opportunities & Key Elements of Colorado’s Psychedelic Licensing System

Colorado’s Natural Medicine Health Act (NHMA) program offers flexibility and inclusivity through its innovative blend of personal-use decriminalization and state-regulated models. Compared to Oregon, where access is restricted to psilocybin available exclusively through costly treatments at state-designated service centers, Colorado’s personal-use model provides for ceremonial and recreational uses of several psychedelics outside of the regulated model.

Though the NHMA’s personal-use model provides for payment for bona fide therapy and harm reduction services, it does not permit the retail sale of psychedelics. The NMHA’s regulated model establishes a structured and regulated system for the therapeutic use of psilocybin and related natural medicines, providing a comprehensive framework focused on ensuring public safety, standardizing practices, and providing pathways for licensing facilitators, manufacturers, cultivators, and testing facilities.

Facilitators

The NMHA’s structured pathways for facilitators allow both experienced practitioners and newcomers to enter the market while maintaining high safety and operational standards. All applicants must complete detailed training and certification, including courses on ethics, Colorado’s regulations, and practical facilitation skills.

There are two types of full-scope licenses and two ancillary licenses. Full-scope licenses, which allow the holder to provide Natural Medicine Services independently, include the “Facilitator” and “Clinical Facilitator” licenses. The Facilitator license is available to individuals who meet the specified education and experience criteria. The Clinical Facilitator license is open to those who fulfill the same requirements as a Facilitator but also hold a secondary professional license in Colorado that authorizes them to diagnose and treat medical or behavioral/mental health conditions.

Additionally, two ancillary licenses are defined. The “Distinguished Educator” license is intended for individuals with extensive experience in providing Natural Medicine Services, enabling them to offer these services within a training program. The “Training” license, available to individuals who complete 150 hours of didactic education, allows the licensee to charge for Natural Medicine Services during a supervised consultation period. Neither the Distinguished Educator nor the Training license is considered full-scope, meaning licensees cannot provide Natural Medicine Services independently.

Cultivators, Manufacturers & Testing Facilities

Colorado presents a significant opportunity for cultivators and manufacturers from other states currently operating in the grey market to transition into a fully legal and regulated environment.  Licensing for cultivation, manufacturing, and testing of natural medicine in Colorado follows a tiered approach based on business models:

Cultivators can store up to 5 kilograms of dried whole mushrooms under the standard cultivation tier, while micro-cultivators are allowed up to 750 grams, suitable for small therapy practices or individual facilitators.

For manufacturing, a Natural Medicine Product Manufacturing license is required to produce any product other than whole, dried mushrooms, with manufacturers automatically permitted to produce capsules and tea bags. They can also obtain an Extraction Endorsement, which authorizes the production of chocolate, gummies, pressed tablets, and tinctures.
Natural Medicine Testing Facilities, which can co-locate with marijuana testing labs, are certified by the Colorado Department of Health and Environment and accredited for specific tests. These facilities are currently restricted from testing unregulated natural medicine, though future provisions for personal use testing are anticipated.

Education and Training Programs

As mandatory training requirements for Facilitators increase, there is a growing demand for educational programs tailored to natural medicine facilitation. Companies can develop state-approved courses that meet the Department of Regulatory Agencies’ standards, creating opportunities to train aspiring Facilitators. Regulations outline the criteria for program approval, including organizational standards, administrative responsibilities, recordkeeping, and faculty composition. Training programs must be approved by the Office of Natural Medicine to ensure graduates are eligible for licensure.

The Path Forward to Bridge the Psychedelic Divide

The psychedelic ecosystem is at a crucial crossroads, with regulatory frameworks like Colorado’s NMHA offering a structured pathway for businesses to transition from the illicit underground market into a legitimate, regulated ecosystem. The success or failure of Colorado’s innovative healing paradigm is a harbinger of the success of the larger psychedelic movement. However, achieving a sustainable above-ground market requires meaningful collaboration with the underground community, which has long played a vital role in preserving public access to psychedelics.

Both the underground and regulated industries are interdependent for long-term success. For the regulated programs to succeed, they must incorporate the needs of underground operators to assuage their concerns about participation. Without collaboration, the legal market will be vulnerable to regulatory shutdowns due to the rise in harm and misuse from unregulated products, while the underground remains exposed to enforcement risks.

By bridging this divide, psychedelic proponents can help build a unified, credible, and thriving ecosystem—one that safeguards public health, ensures equitable access, and paves the way for sustainable, nationwide policy. Only through collaboration can the full potential of psychedelics be realized, benefiting individuals, communities, and society at large.

About the Authors

Written by Jodi Green, Matthew Brockmeier, and Karina Bashir, Antithesis Law PC

For updates on psychedelic law issues, stay tuned in with Antithesis Law online, on Instagram, and on LinkedIn.

Subscribe to Fat Nugs Magazine!

Love this article? Show your support for Fat Nugs with a magazine subscription!

As a fully independent media organization, Fat Nugs relies on the grassroots support of individuals like you to continue to write and share these articles. Every subscription helps us keep bringing you the unbiased, broad-ranging cannabis, hemp, and psychedelics articles like these.

Search for Articles